<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>METHODOLOGY on Flowing Code</title><link>https://www.flowingcode.com/en/category/methodology/</link><description>Recent content in METHODOLOGY on Flowing Code</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.flowingcode.com/en/category/methodology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Time &amp; Material vs Fixed Price? Why We Prefer the Flexible Approach</title><link>https://www.flowingcode.com/en/time-material-vs-fixed-price-why-we-prefer-the-flexible-approach/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:55:09 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.flowingcode.com/en/time-material-vs-fixed-price-why-we-prefer-the-flexible-approach/</guid><description>&lt;figure class="wp-block-image size-large">&lt;img alt="" class="wp-image-1580" height="510" loading="lazy" src="https://www.flowingcode.com/images/uploads/2024/04/image-20-1024x510.png" width="1024"/>&lt;/figure>
&lt;p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" target="_blank">software development&lt;/a> contracts, businesses typically face a choice between two common pricing models: time and material, and fixed price. These frameworks offer distinct approaches to budgeting, project scope, and risk management. In this blog post, we’ll explore the differences between these two models, outlining their respective advantages and drawbacks. This discussion will help clarify why our company has chosen the time and material approach and offer insights into how it aligns with our business values and project management style. Stay tuned as we delve into the nuances of these pricing strategies and share the reasons behind our decision.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>